Cannabis, alcohol and fatal road accidents.

Cannabis

INTRODUCTION:

This research aims to estimate the relative risks of responsibility for a fatal accident linked to driving under the influence of cannabis or alcohol, the prevalence of these influences among drivers and the corresponding attributable risk ratios. A secondary goal is to estimate the same items for three other groups of illicit drugs (amphetamines, cocaine and opiates), and to compare the results to a similar study carried out in France between 2001 and 2003.

METHODOLOGY:

Police procedures for fatal accidents in Metropolitan France during 2011 were analyzed and 300 characteristics encoded to provide a database of 4,059 drivers. Information on alcohol and four groups of illicit drugs derived from tests for positivity and potential confirmation through blood analysis. The study compares drivers responsible for causing the accident, that is to say having directly contributed to its occurrence, to drivers involved in an accident for which they were not responsible, and who can be assimilated to drivers in general.

RESULTS:

The proportion of persons driving under the influence of alcohol is estimated at 2.1% (95% CI: 1.4-2.8) and under the influence of cannabis at 3.4% (2.9%-3.9%). Drivers under the influence of alcohol are 17.8 times (12.1-26.1) more likely to be responsible for a fatal accident, and the proportion of fatal accidents which would be prevented if no drivers ever exceeded the legal limit for alcohol is estimated at 27.7% (26.0%-29.4%). Drivers under the influence of cannabis multiply their risk of being responsible for causing a fatal accident by 1.65 (1.16-2.34), and the proportion of fatal accidents which would be prevented if no drivers ever drove under the influence of cannabis is estimated at 4.2% (3.7%-4.8%). An increased risk linked to opiate use has also been found to be significant, but with low prevalence, requiring caution in interpreting this finding. Other groups of narcotics have even lower prevalence, and the associated extra risks cannot be assessed.

Consulter en ligne

À lire aussi

  • Cannabis / Article scientifique

    Douleur chronique, légalisation du cannabis et troubles liés à la consommation de cannabis chez les patients du système de santé des vétérans américains de 2005 à 2019

    30 Oct 2023
  • Autres drogues / Article

    CBD, protoxyde d’azote… Combien de Français consomment ces produits ?

    27 Oct 2023
  • Cannabis / Article

    Cannabis : prendre du CBD ou conduire, il faut choisir

    18 Sep 2023
  • Cannabis / Article scientifique

    Cannabis et sport : le point de vue de l’Agence mondiale antidopage (AMA)

    28 Août 2023
  • Cannabis / Article scientifique

    L’impact de la légalisation/dépénalisation du cannabis sur les intoxications aiguës

    28 Août 2023
  • Alcool / Article

    Coût social des drogues : « C’est l’alcool et le tabac qui ont le plus gros impact sur les finances publiques »

    04 Août 2023
  • Autres drogues / Article

    La France au cœur des trafics de drogue : un regard géopolitique

    26 Juil 2023
  • Cannabis / Article scientifique

    Cannabis et neurodéveloppement : les conséquences in utéro, en période périnatale et à l’adolescence

    20 Juil 2023
  • Cannabis / Article

    "Le consommateur devient le cobaye" : un mois après l'interdiction du HHC en France, de nouvelles substances sont déjà en vente

    13 Juil 2023
  • Autres drogues / Article

    Drogue : "On veut faire croire que pour lutter contre les trafics, il faut s'attaquer aux consommateurs", déplore le Syndicat de la magistrature

    27 Juin 2023
  • Cannabis / Article

    Jeunes et cannabis, au-delà des caricatures

    23 Juin 2023
  • Alcool

    Prévenir et réduire les risques liés aux addictions en milieu festif

    21 Juin 2023